L'Echo de Paris (after Braque)
Embedded Files
2018-24Oil paint, enamel paint, pasted wallpaper, and sand on canvas121.9 x 106.6 cm / 48 x 42 inches
About the Work
At once a meticulous homage, recursive intervention, and poetic derailment, L’Écho de Paris (after Braque) is part of Nick Fudge’s long-standing engagement with the metaphysics of copying, memory, and recursion. In this work—like its counterpart One Infinite Loop—Fudge reconsiders canonical Cubist forms not by restating them but by recoding their internal logic in relation to digital systems, contemporary art histories, and obsolescent metaphors drawn from both early computing and 1990s consumer culture.The painting is materially dense, built from a tactile composite of oil paint, enamel, wallpaper, and sand. Its surface is at once archaeological and synthetic: an excavation of visual memory embedded in layers of painterly logic. As with its source—the Georges Braque painting that also bears the name L’Écho de Paris—the composition retains many hallmarks of high analytical Cubism. But here the schematic oval format, so crucial to Braque and Picasso’s attempts at pictorial containment, has been subtly dismantled. Re-situated within a rectangle, the oval is partially preserved, partially dissolved—its legacy haunting the painting’s internal tension between formal coherence and metaphysical displacement.This conceptual obfuscation is part parody, part metaphysical inquiry. Fudge deliberately critiques the modernist "solution" of the oval (as a refuge from contingency) by inserting it back into a format that reintroduces risk: the rectangle, with its “extra” and unruly spaces. Just outside the ghosted oval, Fudge installs artificial intelligences: miniature DALL·E-generated versions of the original Braque painting, and AI-modified passages via Photoshop. These small disturbances, subtle yet deliberate, enact a mnemotechnic recursion, disrupting the integrity of the image while recalling its sources through automated proxies.Embedded within the layers of the painting is a painted-over macOS bomb icon, once used to signify a system crash in early Macintosh operating systems. Like the concealed newspaper fragment in Braque’s original—L’Écho de Paris—this icon serves as a displaced semantic residue. Fudge ties the bomb to Stéphane Mallarmé’s conception of the metaphysical book as an object of delay, catastrophe, and potential. As in One Infinite Loop, the hidden detail is not an Easter egg but a philosophical pitfall: an encrypted symbol of poetic system failure, where meaning collapses under recursion.Painted letters across the canvas boldly spell ESCAPE, referencing the 1990s perfume of the same name and, by extension, the masculinist myth of transcendence—of the poet, the Cubist, the computer scientist. Elsewhere, fragmented typographic hints point to other 1990s perfumes: OPIUM, POLO, JOOP, PARIS—each fracturing across the surface like disassembled brand ideograms. These are not nostalgic, but structural. In Fudge’s logic, they function as data layers of the contemporary unconscious, mapping the mnemonic trace of culture-as-code into Cubism’s now-permeable architecture.The painting's title, L’Écho de Paris, is reasserted on the canvas—but not where it was in Braque's original. Fudge stencils it vertically along the far-left margin in a Mallarméan gesture of semantic displacement. The echo, once internal to the composition, is now removed to the border—a reversal that enacts the painting's key metaphysical trope: what exists just beyond the frame is what structures it.In sum, L’Écho de Paris (after Braque) stands not as a critique of Cubism, but as a recursive update—a conceptual patch that operates across eras, systems, and media. It exemplifies Fudge’s broader practice of transforming historical painting into a software of metaphysical functions, where memory, delay, failure, and parody converge into forms of pictorial intelligence.
L’Écho de Paris (After Braque) is a meticulous homage, a poetic detour, and a recursive intervention. It is part of Nick Fudge’s ongoing exploration of the metaphysics of copying, memory, and recursion. In this work—like its counterpart One Infinite Loop—Fudge reimagines canonical Cubist forms by reinterpreting their internal logic in relation to digital systems, contemporary art histories, and obsolete metaphors drawn from early computing and 1990s consumer culture.This materially dense painting is constructed from a tactile composite of oil paint, enamel, wallpaper, and sand. Its surface is simultaneously archaeological and synthetic—an excavation of visual memory embedded in layers of painterly logic. Like its source, Georges Braque's 1913 painting Still Life with Glass and Newspaper (Le Guéridon), the composition retains many hallmarks of analytical cubism. However, the schematic oval format, which was crucial to Braque and Picasso's attempts at pictorial containment, has been subtly dismantled here. Resituated within a rectangle, the oval is partially preserved and partially dissolved, its legacy haunting the painting's internal tension between formal coherence and metaphysical displacement.This conceptual obfuscation is part parody and part metaphysical inquiry. Deliberately critiquing the modernist "solution" of the oval as a refuge from contingency, Fudge reintroduces risk by placing it in a format with "extra" and unruly spaces: the rectangle. Just outside the ghosted oval, Fudge installs artificial intelligences: miniature, DALL·E-generated versions of the original Braque painting and AI-modified Photoshop passages. These small, deliberate disturbances create a mnemonic recursion, disrupting the image's integrity while recalling its sources through automated proxies.Embedded within the painting's layers is a painted-over macOS bomb icon, which was once used to signify a system crash in early Macintosh operating systems. Like the concealed newspaper fragment in Braque’s original—L’Écho de Paris—this icon serves as displaced semantic residue. Fudge connects the bomb to Stéphane Mallarmé’s concept of the metaphysical book as an object of delay, catastrophe, and potential. As in One Infinite Loop, the hidden detail is not an Easter egg, but a philosophical pitfall—an encrypted symbol of poetic system failure, where meaning collapses under recursion.Painted letters across the canvas boldly spell "ESCAPE," referencing the 1990s perfume of the same name, as well as the myth of masculine transcendence—that of the poet, the Cubist, and the computer scientist. Elsewhere, fragmented typographic hints point to other 1990s perfumes: OPIUM, POLO, JOOP, and PARIS. These fractured brand ideograms are scattered across the surface. They are structural, not nostalgic. According to Fudge's logic, they function as data layers of the contemporary unconscious, mapping the mnemonic trace of culture-as-code into Cubism's permeable architecture.The painting's title, L’Écho de Paris, appears on the canvas though not in the same place as in Braque's original. Fudge stencils it vertically along the far-left margin in a Mallarméan gesture of semantic displacement. The echo, once internal to the composition, is now on the border—a reversal that enacts the painting's key metaphysical trope. What exists beyond the frame structures it.In sum, L’Écho de Paris (after Braque) is not a critique of Cubism, but rather a recursive update—a conceptual patch operating across eras, systems, and media. The painting exemplifies Fudge’s broader practice of transforming historical paintings into software for metaphysical functions, where memory, delay, failure, and parody converge to form a kind of pictorial intelligence.
L’Écho de Paris (After Braque) is a meticulous homage, a poetic detour, and a recursive intervention. It is part of Nick Fudge’s ongoing exploration of the metaphysics of copying, memory, and recursion. In this work—like its counterpart One Infinite Loop—Fudge reimagines canonical Cubist forms by reinterpreting their internal logic in relation to digital systems, contemporary art histories, and obsolete metaphors drawn from early computing and 1990s consumer culture.This materially dense painting is constructed from a tactile composite of oil paint, enamel, wallpaper, and sand. Its surface is simultaneously archaeological and synthetic—an excavation of visual memory embedded in layers of painterly logic. Like its source, Georges Braque's 1913 painting Still Life with Glass and Newspaper (Le Guéridon), the composition retains many hallmarks of analytical cubism. However, the schematic oval format, which was crucial to Braque and Picasso's attempts at pictorial containment, has been subtly dismantled here. Resituated within a rectangle, the oval is partially preserved and partially dissolved, its legacy haunting the painting's internal tension between formal coherence and metaphysical displacement.This conceptual obfuscation is part parody and part metaphysical inquiry. Deliberately critiquing the modernist "solution" of the oval as a refuge from contingency, Fudge reintroduces risk by placing it in a format with "extra" and unruly spaces: the rectangle. Just outside the ghosted oval, Fudge installs artificial intelligences: miniature, DALL·E-generated versions of the original Braque painting and AI-modified Photoshop passages. These small, deliberate disturbances create a mnemonic recursion, disrupting the image's integrity while recalling its sources through automated proxies.Embedded within the painting's layers is a painted-over macOS bomb icon, which was once used to signify a system crash in early Macintosh operating systems. Like the concealed newspaper fragment in Braque’s original—L’Écho de Paris—this icon serves as displaced semantic residue. Fudge connects the bomb to Stéphane Mallarmé’s concept of the metaphysical book as an object of delay, catastrophe, and potential. As in One Infinite Loop, the hidden detail is not an Easter egg, but a philosophical pitfall—an encrypted symbol of poetic system failure, where meaning collapses under recursion.Painted letters across the canvas boldly spell "ESCAPE," referencing the 1990s perfume of the same name, as well as the myth of masculine transcendence—that of the poet, the Cubist, and the computer scientist. Elsewhere, fragmented typographic hints point to other 1990s perfumes: OPIUM, POLO, JOOP, and PARIS. These fractured brand ideograms are scattered across the surface. They are structural, not nostalgic. According to Fudge's logic, they function as data layers of the contemporary unconscious, mapping the mnemonic trace of culture-as-code into Cubism's permeable architecture.The painting's title, L’Écho de Paris, appears on the canvas though not in the same place as in Braque's original. Fudge stencils it vertically along the far-left margin in a Mallarméan gesture of semantic displacement. The echo, once internal to the composition, is now on the border—a reversal that enacts the painting's key metaphysical trope. What exists beyond the frame structures it.In sum, L’Écho de Paris (after Braque) is not a critique of Cubism, but rather a recursive update—a conceptual patch operating across eras, systems, and media. The painting exemplifies Fudge’s broader practice of transforming historical paintings into software for metaphysical functions, where memory, delay, failure, and parody converge to form a kind of pictorial intelligence.
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse