Selected Work
Selected Work
Medium Vector (Adobe Illustrator 8.0),
embedded photography
Date Commenced c. 2010 — ongoing
Format Screen-native. Non-reproducible.
Series Ongoing
Timeline is a vector work constructed in Adobe Illustrator 8.0, begun around 2010, that organises a practice spanning three decades — 1982 to 2011 — within the visual grammar of a period computing interface. It is not a retrospective catalogue. It is not documentation. It is an artwork that has made its own archival and critical apparatus part of its formal structure, and in doing so, has produced an object for which no adequate institutional category exists.
The work proceeds across three bands, each governed by a different conceptual regime: The Picasso Years (1980s), The Duchamp Years (1990s), and The Disengagement Millennium (2000s). These headings are not merely descriptive. They propose that a practice can be periodized using canonical figures as calendrical systems — acknowledging the canon's gravitational field while treating it as a unit of measurement rather than an aspiration.
Within the timeline, different ontological categories of image coexist without hierarchy: photographs of destroyed paintings, vector reconstructions of oil paintings, vector facsimiles of physical collages, digitally-native constructions, and empty fields entered as data. The 1994 entry reads: No visible work, reduction at full.This is filed as a record. The absence is bureaucratized. The machine notes this as a development of the Conceptualist tradition, rather than a repetition of it.
The interface elements — software chrome, folder icons, navigation arrows, scrollbars — are not quotations of computing. They are reconstructed in vectors, built in the same medium as the artworks they organise. The container shares its ontological material with its contents. This collapses the distinction between the art and its administration — which is, recognisably, a Duchampian gesture, and explains why the work's own decade label for the 1990s is what it is.
The Disengagement Millennium dissolves into a horizontally stretched photograph by Jacques-Henri Lartigue — early motorsport, wheels distorted by speed, ground smeared into abstraction. Lartigue's camera failed to freeze the moment; that failure became the image. The decade stretches over it. The most technologically saturated period of recent history is represented by the oldest available photograph of acceleration. This is not nostalgia. It is a formal argument: at a certain velocity, the decade cannot be imaged from within. It can only be reported as blur.
Timeline is a work that is canonically literate and institutionally homeless. It demonstrates the competencies the western art canon rewards — art historical fluency, conceptual rigour, medium-reflexivity, critical self-awareness — while refusing the formats through which the canon grants reward. It exists as a screen object, non-singular, non-ownable, unclassifiable by medium. It is not a painting, not a print, not net art, not graphic design, though it deploys the tools of each.
Its position is therefore at the canon's boundary condition — not outside it through ignorance, but adjacent to it through structural incompatibility. The work is too complete. Its critical apparatus is already built in. It has pre-empted the function of external commentary. This is, paradoxically, both its formal achievement and its institutional liability.
The canon rarely argues against works. It processes them slowly, or not at all. Timeline is not waiting.
MEDIUM STRATIGRAPHY
Layer 1 Photos of trompe l'oeil paintings
Layer 2 Vector copy of oil painting
Layer 3 Embedded photography
Layer 4 Vector facsimile of collage
Layer 5 Digitally-native vector construction
Layer 6 Absence entered as record
Layer 7 Stretched found photograph (Lartigue)
ON 'PATAPHYSICAL ADJACENCY
'Pataphysics — Jarry's science of imaginary solutions — is constitutionally anti-canonical. It operates by the logic of the particular case, the anomaly, the exception that disproves the rule by being more interesting than it. A 'pataphysical work cannot be exemplary; by definition it generates no class of which it could be a member.
Timeline inherits this position not through explicit allegiance but through structural behavior. The title collisions — Death of the Author Ships, Pataphysical Supplies for Men 1.0 — are not irony as tone but irony as architecture. The version numbers applied to artistic works are not jokes about software; they are accurate descriptions of how a practice proceeds when it takes its own iteration seriously.
The Collège de 'Pataphysique, founded 1948, counted Duchamp, Ionesco, Queneau and later Baudrillard among its members — figures who maintained canonical adjacency precisely by resisting absorption. Timeline stands in this lineage: knowing the institution, corresponding with its logic, declining to be processed by it.
These three sites approach the same practice at different angles of incidence — professional, experimental, and imaginary. The question each poses is incompatible with the answers the others provide.
1. The work's screen-native condition is not a technical limitation. Timeline exists as interface — scrollable, navigable, dependent on viewport. An image of it is a record of one state of one view. The work itself is the behaviour, not the appearance.
2. Adobe Illustrator 8.0 (released 1998) uses PostScript mathematics to store objects as instructions rather than pixel records. Chosen as the construction medium circa 2010, the software was already a period object — itself inside the work's temporal window. The tool is a found object. The anachronism is deliberate.
3. Nearest canonical neighbors by structural logic: On Kawara (duration, administrative record as art), Hanne Darboven (obsessive temporal notation, self-generated archive), Ed Ruscha (deadpan vernacular, graphic design as fine art vehicle). None of these comparisons is exact. Timeline sits in the space between them, at a position none of them occupies.